The main question for both Kazakhs and the international community concerning Kazakhstan’s future is whether the country will achieve economic prosperity in the coming decades. Particularly with its enormous oil and natural gas resources, the country has tremendous potential for economic development. Theoretically, at least, Kazakhstan could become one of Asia’s leading economic powers. The country also could become the most eco- nomically advanced among the now independent countries that formerly were republics within the Soviet Union.
Only the people of Kazakhstan have the power to determine their future. Under Soviet control, the Kazakhs spent seven decades under one-party Communist rule. In 1990, when a multiparty democracy was introduced, Kazakhs chose their current president to lead them into the twenty-first century. Tired of Moscow’s political domination, they elected their own man, a former Communist, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who, more than a decade later, still serves as president.
Opposition to the present government is practically nonexistent, however, since it would not be tolerated. This situation in Kazakhstan is something that has occurred in nearly all former Soviet republics. Before elections, country leaders promised the separation of powers and the establish- ment of an American type of democracy. Once the former Communist Party members achieved victor y, however, things changed rapidly. They concentrated on introducing constitutional changes by “popular” referendum that expanded presidential powers and limited the power of the legislature (parliament). Once they gained additional consti- tutional power by reducing checks-and-balances by other branches of government, they began to silence other political parties or watchdog groups. At the same time, the families of those in power often became involved in extensive corruption and various scandals. In Kazakhstan, for example, the presi- dent has been unable to explain (in a satisfactory manner) the source of the funds in an $80 million account in a Swiss bank with which he is connected.
Corruption on all levels of government — from local politicians to the highest circles of power — is an everyday occurrence in postcommunist countries. But there are other Communist-era related problems as well. Communist gov- ernments centrally planned their countries’ economies. This resulted in the newly emerged independent former Soviet republics having inadequate networks of highways, railroads, and other vital aspects of infrastructure, such as power lines and pipelines. Also, with so much of the country’s capital resources being siphoned off by government leaders, few funds are available to upgrade the infrastructure to Western levels.
Kazakhs must understand that only radical changes in some elements of their lifestyle can bring them wanted pros- perity. One of these elements is the elimination of the growing apathy toward political participation among the Kazakhstan’s population. To change the political conditions and create a different climate, voters’ active engagement is necessary.
There is another important emotional issue that must be resolved among Kazakhs: they must begin concentrating on the future, rather than reliving the past. Even to an outsider, it is obvious that many ethnic Kazakhs and ethnic Russians still have the burden of the Soviet Union on their minds. To Kazakhs, Russia represents another form of imperialistic force that ruled their homelands for many decades. Governmental policies during the 1990s proved that Kazakhs desperately want to establish their independence from Russia in all possible ways. At the same time, a vast number of Kazakhstan’s Russians did not want to accept the fact that they were now living in a different country. The first step toward joint life in Kazakhstan should be the formation of a bilingual society where the major- ity of people speak both the Kazakh and Russian languages. By knowing and understanding different cultures, we develop respect toward them; rejection almost always is a product of ignorance. As a result of prejudice and discrimination exhib- ited by both Russians and Kazakhs, several million Russians left Kazakhstan between 1991 and 2002. A great number of them were well-educated people, thereby creating a “brain drain” that deprived the country of some of its best human resources.
As we know, people are a country’s most important capital. Educated, hard-working people are essential to the economic development of any nation. The Kazakhs waited for so long to have a country of their own. Now that they have achieved their precious independence, they must make the most of the opportunity.
Part of Kazakhstan’s future is located deep below the surface. Proven oil and natural gas reserves in the country’s western oblasts are enormous. Western multinational companies are more than willing to cooperate with Kazakhs and establish joint ventures for further research and exploration. It can bring thousands of new jobs to young people and lower the high unemployment rate in Kazakhstan.
Few Americans consider themselves to be experts in the physical, historical, and cultural geography of the former Soviet Union. Kazakhstan, to many people, is little more than one of the region’s many “stan”-ending countries in which some type of conflict is occurring. Certainly the country is not a primary tourist destination. Most people simply do not know much about Central Asia.
Yet Kazakhstan is a peaceful and life-loving country that has much to offer. Kazakhs should invite outsiders to visit and enjoy their country more often. They need to show others that their country is more than just a former nuclear testing range, a space center, or oil fields. It is a country with much to recom- mend it to the visitor in search of an interesting and unique culture and destination.
Only the people of Kazakhstan have the power to determine their future. Under Soviet control, the Kazakhs spent seven decades under one-party Communist rule. In 1990, when a multiparty democracy was introduced, Kazakhs chose their current president to lead them into the twenty-first century. Tired of Moscow’s political domination, they elected their own man, a former Communist, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who, more than a decade later, still serves as president.
Opposition to the present government is practically nonexistent, however, since it would not be tolerated. This situation in Kazakhstan is something that has occurred in nearly all former Soviet republics. Before elections, country leaders promised the separation of powers and the establish- ment of an American type of democracy. Once the former Communist Party members achieved victor y, however, things changed rapidly. They concentrated on introducing constitutional changes by “popular” referendum that expanded presidential powers and limited the power of the legislature (parliament). Once they gained additional consti- tutional power by reducing checks-and-balances by other branches of government, they began to silence other political parties or watchdog groups. At the same time, the families of those in power often became involved in extensive corruption and various scandals. In Kazakhstan, for example, the presi- dent has been unable to explain (in a satisfactory manner) the source of the funds in an $80 million account in a Swiss bank with which he is connected.
Corruption on all levels of government — from local politicians to the highest circles of power — is an everyday occurrence in postcommunist countries. But there are other Communist-era related problems as well. Communist gov- ernments centrally planned their countries’ economies. This resulted in the newly emerged independent former Soviet republics having inadequate networks of highways, railroads, and other vital aspects of infrastructure, such as power lines and pipelines. Also, with so much of the country’s capital resources being siphoned off by government leaders, few funds are available to upgrade the infrastructure to Western levels.
Kazakhs must understand that only radical changes in some elements of their lifestyle can bring them wanted pros- perity. One of these elements is the elimination of the growing apathy toward political participation among the Kazakhstan’s population. To change the political conditions and create a different climate, voters’ active engagement is necessary.
There is another important emotional issue that must be resolved among Kazakhs: they must begin concentrating on the future, rather than reliving the past. Even to an outsider, it is obvious that many ethnic Kazakhs and ethnic Russians still have the burden of the Soviet Union on their minds. To Kazakhs, Russia represents another form of imperialistic force that ruled their homelands for many decades. Governmental policies during the 1990s proved that Kazakhs desperately want to establish their independence from Russia in all possible ways. At the same time, a vast number of Kazakhstan’s Russians did not want to accept the fact that they were now living in a different country. The first step toward joint life in Kazakhstan should be the formation of a bilingual society where the major- ity of people speak both the Kazakh and Russian languages. By knowing and understanding different cultures, we develop respect toward them; rejection almost always is a product of ignorance. As a result of prejudice and discrimination exhib- ited by both Russians and Kazakhs, several million Russians left Kazakhstan between 1991 and 2002. A great number of them were well-educated people, thereby creating a “brain drain” that deprived the country of some of its best human resources.
As we know, people are a country’s most important capital. Educated, hard-working people are essential to the economic development of any nation. The Kazakhs waited for so long to have a country of their own. Now that they have achieved their precious independence, they must make the most of the opportunity.
Part of Kazakhstan’s future is located deep below the surface. Proven oil and natural gas reserves in the country’s western oblasts are enormous. Western multinational companies are more than willing to cooperate with Kazakhs and establish joint ventures for further research and exploration. It can bring thousands of new jobs to young people and lower the high unemployment rate in Kazakhstan.
Few Americans consider themselves to be experts in the physical, historical, and cultural geography of the former Soviet Union. Kazakhstan, to many people, is little more than one of the region’s many “stan”-ending countries in which some type of conflict is occurring. Certainly the country is not a primary tourist destination. Most people simply do not know much about Central Asia.
Yet Kazakhstan is a peaceful and life-loving country that has much to offer. Kazakhs should invite outsiders to visit and enjoy their country more often. They need to show others that their country is more than just a former nuclear testing range, a space center, or oil fields. It is a country with much to recom- mend it to the visitor in search of an interesting and unique culture and destination.